- PM Modi visit USAOnly the mirror in my washroom and phone gallery see the crazy me : Sara KhanKarnataka rain fury: Photos of flooded streets, uprooted treesCannes 2022: Deepika Padukone stuns at the French Riviera in Sabyasachi outfitRanbir Kapoor And Alia Bhatt's Wedding Pics - Sealed With A KissOscars 2022: Every Academy Award WinnerShane Warne (1969-2022): Australian cricket legend's life in picturesPhotos: What Russia's invasion of Ukraine looks like on the groundLata Mangeshkar (1929-2022): A pictorial tribute to the 'Nightingale of India'PM Modi unveils 216-feet tall Statue of Equality in Hyderabad (PHOTOS)
Badminton Federation of India (BAI) on Tuesday announced the cash reward of Rs 50 lakh for
- Laver Cup: Tiafoe upsets Medvedev, Alcaraz pulls Team Europe level with Team World
- Cincinnati Open: Tiafoe, Hurkacz, Rune and Draper in the quarters
- Paris Olympics: Abhinav Bindra 'completely gutted' after Vinesh Phogat's disqualification
- Paris Olympics: USA, China in Top-2, India slip to 60th
- Paris Olympics, Medal Tally: USA jump to top, China slip to 2nd; India on 57th
Resolve Ayodhya dispute amicably: SC Last Updated : 21 Mar 2017 11:30:37 AM IST File photo
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that the amicable settlement of the Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute was a better course than on insisting on judicial pronouncement.
A bench of Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said this as BJP leader Subramanian Swamy urged it to constitute a bench to hear a batch of petitions challenging a 2010 Allahabad High Court order.
The 2010 order said that there should be a partition of the Ayodhya land between the parties to the dispute.
Saying that negotiated settlement between the parties to the dispute was the best course, Chief Justice Khehar offered to act as a mediator provided that he would not hear the matter on the judicial side.
Pointing towards Justice Kaul, the Chief Justice said that he too could mediate.
Justice Khehar told Swamy: "Any person of your choice. You want me to mediate (but) I will not hear (on judicial side). You want my brother (Judge). There are issues. You all sit together across the table and decide."IANS For Latest Updates Please-
Join us on
Follow us on
172.31.16.186