Justice J.R. Midha held that the suit filed by Juhi Chawla and two others was defective, non-maintainable, and also contained unverified and vexatious assertions.

 

The High Court also expressed dissatisfaction at Juhi Chawla sharing the link of virtual hearing on her social media account. During the hearing of Chawla's suit, unknown persons repeatedly disturbed by singing Bollywood songs of films in which she had acted. The court directed the Delhi Police to identify these persons and proceed against them under the law.

 

Observing that Juhi Chawla did not approach any of the 33 defendants named in her suit and instead sought a declaration from the court, the bench said this declaration cannot be allowed under the law. It also said Chawla did not deposit the court fees for her suit and directed her to pay Rs 1.95 lakh within one week.

 

On June 2, the High Court had questioned Juhi Chawla as to why she had directly filed a suit against setting up of 5G wireless networks without making any representation to the department concerned in the government, and insisted the plaintiffs, Chawla and two others, should have gone to the government first.

 

After hearing the arguments in the matter, the court reserved its order.

 

The plea filed by Juhi Chawla, Veeresh Malik and Teena Vachani claimed that 5G wireless technology can be a potential threat to provoke irreversible and serious effects on humans and it could also permanently damage to the earth's ecosystems.

 

The plea contended that to levels of RF radiation that are 10x to 100x times greater than the existing levels, and no living species on the planet would be able to survive round the clock exposure.